A Systematic Modeling Approach for Cost-Efficient Operations in Electrical Grids Using Design of Experiments
Downloads
Keywords
Article Usage Chart
Abstract
The increasing complexity of modern electrical grids, driven by rising energy demand, renewable energy integration, and distributed generation, has amplified the need for systematic and cost-efficient operational strategies. Traditional approaches to grid management often rely on heuristic methods or reactive adjustments, which fail to fully account for interactions between key operational variables such as load distribution, reactive power control, distributed generation penetration, and energy storage dispatch. This research introduces a comprehensive, data-driven framework employing a Design of Experiments (DoE) methodology to systematically evaluate the impact of these operational factors on total grid operational costs. By integrating mathematical modeling of power systems with factorial experimentation, the proposed approach enables simultaneous assessment of multiple variables and their interactions, providing statistically robust insights into cost drivers and efficiency trade-offs.
The methodology models the electrical network as a combination of nodes and branches, incorporating conventional generation units, distributed renewable resources, storage systems, and load demand profiles. Operational costs are quantified as a composite function of generation, line losses, and ancillary services, including voltage regulation and reactive power compensation. Factorial designs are employed to simulate various operational scenarios, with high- and low-level combinations of control variables analyzed to identify configurations that minimize total cost while maintaining voltage stability and system reliability. Regression and ANOVA analyses are applied to determine the statistical significance of each factor and interaction, following the framework outlined by Vogt et al. (2012).
Simulation results demonstrate that coordinated optimization of load distribution, reactive power settings, and renewable integration can reduce operational costs by up to 14%, while line losses and voltage deviations are simultaneously minimized. Significant interactions between load distribution and reactive power control are identified, highlighting the necessity of a multi-variable optimization approach. Integration of energy storage is shown to enhance peak load management and provide further cost reductions, though uncoordinated deployment of distributed generation can result in ancillary costs if voltage stability is not maintained. The study also reveals that regression-based predictive modeling enables proactive operational decision-making, offering utilities a quantitative tool for balancing cost-efficiency with system reliability.
This research contributes both theoretically and practically by bridging the gap between operational optimization and experimental design in power systems. It provides a structured methodology for assessing complex interactions among operational variables, quantifying cost-saving opportunities, and guiding real-time control strategies. The findings have significant implications for utilities, policymakers, and grid operators,
particularly in systems with high renewable penetration or variable demand profiles. Future work may extend the framework to incorporate stochastic modeling for renewable intermittency, adaptive real-time control, and integration with smart grid technologies, further enhancing the operational efficiency and economic sustainability of electrical grids.
Downloads
References
1. Abdallah, J., "Distribution Network Planning and Design Using Branch and Bound Methods", American Journal of Applied Science, 2(3), Pages 644-647, 2005.
2. Ali Nourai, V.I. Kogan and Chris M. Schafer, "Load Leveling Reduces T&D Line Losses", IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 23 Issue: 4, Pages 2168 – 2173, 11 April 2008.
3. Al-Omari Z. and Abdallah J. Modeling Additional Operational Costs Incurred Due to Absent of the Optimal Correction in Electrical Systems. Journal of applied sciences, Volume 8, No. (23); Pages 4422-2227, 2008.
4. Al-Omari Z., “Influence of Control Modes of Grid-Connected Solar Photovoltaic Generation on Grid Power Flow”, Engineering 6, Pages 914-922, 2014.
5. A. Khazaee, M. Ghasempour, "Distribution Loss Minimization: A Case Study in a Commercial Section In Mashhad", 22nd International Conference and Exhibition on Electricity Distribution (CIRED 2013), Stockholm, 10-13 June 2013, Paper 0825.
6. Bakhshideh Zad B, Lobry J, Vallée F., "Coordinated control of on-load tap changer and D-STATCOM for voltage regulation of radial distribution systems with DG units", In: 3rd International conference on electric power and energy conversion systems, Istanbul, Turkey; October 2013.
7. C. Budischak, DeAnna Sewell, H. Thomson, L. Mach, D. E. Veron, W. Kempton, "Cost-minimized combinations of wind power, solar power and electrochemical storage, powering the grid up to 99.9% of the time", Journal of Power Sources, Elsevier 225, Pages 60–74, 2013.
8. Glavitsch, H. and R. Bacher, "Optimal Power Flow Algorithms. In Control and Dynamic Systems. Advances in Theory and Applications Vol. 41: Analysis and Control System Techniques for Electric Power Systems Part 1 of 4, Edited by C. T. Leonds, Pages 135-206. Academic Press, Inc. 1991.
9. J.P Navani1, N.K Sharma, Sonal Sapra, "Technical and Non-Technical Losses in Power System and Its Economic Consequence in Indian Economy", International Journal of Electronics and Computer Science Engineering, IJECSE, Vol. 2, Pages 757-761, 2012.
10. Jean-François Toubeau, François Vallée, Zacharie De Grève, Jacques Lobry, "A new approach based on the experimental design method for the improvement of the operational efficiency in Medium Voltage distribution networks, J.F.", Electrical Power and Energy Systems 66, Pages 116–124, 2015.
11. K.C. Mamandur, R.D. Chenoweth. "Optimal Control Of Reactive Power Flow For Improvements In Voltage Profiles And For Real Power Loss Minimization", IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-I1O, No. 7, Pages 3185 –3194, July 1981.
12. R.F. Hirsh, "Power Loss: The Origins of Deregulation and Restructuring in the American Electric Utility System", MIT Press, Cambridge, MA and London, 1999.
13. Dennis J. Sweeney, "Statistics Science“, Encyclopedia Britannica.
14. Ronald E. Walpole et al, "Probability & Statistics for Engineers & Scientists", Prentice Hall 2012.
15. W. Paul Vogt (Editor), Burke Johnson (Editor), R. (Robert) Burke Johnson (Editor), "Correlation and Regression Analysis", Sage Publications Ltd, 2012.
16. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.