A Novel Low-Power Multi-Threshold CMOS Level Shifter Architecture for Leakage Reduction
Downloads
Keywords
Article Usage Chart
Abstract
Level shifters are integral components in modern multi-voltage CMOS systems, enabling reliable communication across voltage domains while maintaining signal integrity. However, conventional designs often suffer from significant static leakage, especially in sub-threshold or near-threshold operations, which severely impacts the energy efficiency of low-power digital circuits. This research presents a novel low-power multi-threshold CMOS level shifter architecture specifically designed for leakage reduction. The proposed design strategically integrates high-threshold (Vth) transistors to minimize subthreshold leakage during idle states and low-threshold transistors to preserve high-speed signal propagation in active modes. In addition, dynamic gate-level biasing is employed to adjust transistor thresholds based on operational conditions, further optimizing leakage and performance trade-offs.
Detailed simulation analysis demonstrates that the architecture achieves 38–42% reduction in static power relative to conventional single-threshold designs, while maintaining minimal propagation delay penalties (~5–7%) and reducing energy per transition by approximately 30%. The approach is benchmarked against prominent existing designs, including ultra-low voltage and sub-threshold level shifters, and consistently demonstrates superior leakage suppression, energy efficiency, and scalable implementation for deep-submicron CMOS processes. The findings provide critical insights into the practical application of multi-threshold techniques for low-power VLSI circuits, highlighting both theoretical underpinnings and system-level advantages. This work establishes a foundation for future research in energy-efficient inter-domain signaling, adaptive threshold management, and optimized design methodologies for next-generation ultra-low-power digital systems.
Downloads
References
1. A Chavan and E MacDonald. “Ultra low voltage level shifters to interface sub and super threshold reconfigurable logic cells”. in Proc. IEEE Aerosp. Conf. 2008: 1-6.
2. A Hasanbegovic and S Aunet. “Low-power subthreshold to above threshold level shifter in 90 nm process”. in Proc. NORCHIP Conf., Trondheim, Norway. 2009: 1-4.
3. JC Chi, HH Lee, SH Tsai, and MC Chi. “Gate level multiple supply voltage assignment algorithm for power optimization under timing constraint”. IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. (VLSI) Syst. 2007; 15(6): 637-648.
4. TH Chen, J Chen, and LT Clark. “Subthreshold to above threshold level shifter design”. J. Low Power Electron. 2006; 2(2): 251-258.
5. P Corsonello, M Lanuzza, and S Perri. “Gate-level body biasing technique for high-speed sub-threshold CMOS logic gates”. Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl. 2012.
6. Marco Lanuzza and Stefania perri. “Low power level shifter for multi supply voltage designs”. IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. (VLSI) Syst. 2012; 59(12): 922-926.
7. KH Koo, JH Seo, ML Ko, and JW Kim. “A new level-up shifter for high speed and wide range interface in ultra deep sub-micron”. in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits Syst., Kobe, Japan. 2005: 1063-1065.
8. S Lütkemeier and U Rückert. “A subthreshold to above-threshold level shifter comprising a wilson current mirror”. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, Exp. Briefs. 2010; 57(9): 721-724.
9. Y Osaki, T Hirose, N Kuroki, and M Numa. “A low-power level shifter with logic error correction for extremely low-voltage digital CMOS LSIs”. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits. 2012; 47(7): 1776-1783.
10. H Soeleman, K Roy, and BC Paul. “Robust subthreshold logic for ultralow power operation”. IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. (VLSI) Syst. 2001; 9(1): 90-99.
11. B Zhai, S Pant, L Nazhandali, S Hanson, J Olson, A Reeves, M Minuth, R Helfand, T Austin, D Sylvester, and D Blaauw. “Energyefficient subthreshold processor design”. IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. (VLSI) Syst. 2009; 17(8): 1127-1137.
12. SN Wooters, BH Calhoun, and TN Blalock. “An energy-efficient subthreshold level converter in 130-nm CMOS”. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, Exp. Briefs. 2010; 57(4): 290-294.