Research Article Peer Reviewed Open Access DOI Supported
Articles

Advanced Ultrasonic Measurement System for Accurate Analysis of Multiphase Liquid Flow in Complex Pipeline Structures

2018-08-21 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2018): Volume 05 Issue 1
Downloads

Keywords

Multiphase flow measurement ultrasonic sensing pipeline monitoring stream data processing
Article Usage Statistics
Live Metrics
Abstract Views
198
File Views
71
PDF
0
HTML
0
Other
71
Total
269

Article Usage Chart

Abstract
198
File Views
71
PDF
0
HTML
0
Other
71
Total
269

Abstract

Multiphase liquid flows within industrial pipelines pose significant challenges for accurate measurement and real-time monitoring due to the inherent complexity of phase interactions, variable flow regimes, and geometric constraints of pipelines. Conventional flow measurement techniques, including orifice plates, Coriolis meters, and gamma densitometers, often fail to provide reliable, high-resolution data in real-world operational conditions, leading to suboptimal process control, increased operational risk, and reduced energy efficiency. This research presents an advanced ultrasonic measurement system designed to enable precise, real-time analysis of multiphase flows within complex pipeline structures. The system integrates a multi-transducer ultrasonic array, optimized for circumferential coverage, with a distributed data stream processing architecture to achieve high temporal and spatial resolution in flow characterization. The measurement approach leverages time-of-flight and Doppler-based acoustic signal processing, enabling accurate detection of phase fractions, velocity profiles, and interfacial dynamics across diverse flow regimes, including stratified, slug, and dispersed flows.
A core contribution of this work is the integration of measurement metadata principles to ensure semantic consistency, traceability, and reproducibility of acquired data across heterogeneous processing layers, aligning with established frameworks for stream processing in industrial monitoring systems (IJECE ISSN: 2088-8708). The computational framework employs real-time ingestion, adaptive filtering, and parallel analytics using state-of-the-art distributed stream processing engines, providing scalability, fault tolerance, and low-latency performance. Validation experiments in a controlled laboratory-scale pipeline network demonstrate that the proposed system achieves superior measurement accuracy compared to traditional flow meters, while maintaining robustness under varying flow conditions and pipeline geometries.
The study further explores the synergy between physical measurement systems and computational analytics, highlighting how ultrasonic sensing integrated with metadata-driven stream processing enables predictive maintenance, early anomaly detection, and optimization of process control in industrial environments. Limitations, including signal attenuation in highly turbulent flows and the dependency on transducer calibration, are critically analyzed, and mitigation strategies are proposed. The findings suggest that the proposed ultrasonic measurement system offers a significant advancement in industrial multiphase flow monitoring, providing both theoretical and practical contributions to fluid dynamics measurement, process analytics, and real-time data-driven decision-making in complex pipeline operations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. D Brickley, et.al.(Eds.). RDF Schema 1.1. W3C recommendation, vol. 25, pp. 2004--2014, January 2014.

2. M. Diván, “Processing Architecture based on Measurement Metadata,” Keynotes proceeding of 5th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization. IEEE, edited by B. Shukla, S. Khatri & P. Kapur, pp.9-18. Noida, India, 2016.

3. M. Diván, “Strategy for Data Stream Processing based on Measurement Metadata (In Spanish),” PhD Thesis. Computer Science School. National University of La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2011.

4. M. Diván and L. Olsina, “Process View for a Data Stream Processing Strategy based on Measurement Metadata,” Electronic Journal of Informatics and Operations Research, vol. 13, nº 1, pp. 16-34, June 2014.

5. M. Diván, et. al., “Towards a Data Processing Architecture for the Weather Radar of the INTA Anguil,” Proceedings of International Workshop on Data Mining with Industrial Applications, IEEE, Edited by S. Gómez, E. Hochsztain & D. Romero. Pp. 72-78. Asunción, Paraguay, 2015.

6. R Estrada and I Ruiz, The Broker: Apache Kafka, Chapter 8 in Big Data SMACK: A Guide to Apache Spark, Mesos, Akka, Cassandra, and Kafka. pp. 165-203. Apress, Berkeley, CA, USA. 2016.

7. M. Frampton, Mastering Apache Spark, Packt Publishing Ltd., Birmingham, England, 2015.

8. Gematronik, Rainbow® 5 Products & Algorithms, Gematronik GmbH. Neuss, Germany, 2005.

9. A. Jain and A. Nalya, “Learning Storm. Create real-time stream processing applications with Apache Storm,” Packt Publishing Ltd., Birmingham, England, 2014.

10. M. Lee, et.al., “Load Adaptive and Fault Tolerant Distributed Stream Processing System for Explosive Stream Data,” ICACT Transactions on Advanced Communications Technology, vol.5 n° 1, pp. 745-751, January 2016.

11. H. Molina and L. Olsina, “Towards the Support of Contextual Information to a Measurement and Evaluation Framework,” Proceedings of 6th International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC). IEEE, edited by R. Machado, F. Brito e Abreu & P. da Cunha, pp. 154-166. Lisbon, Portugal, 2007.

12. Open Geospatial Consortium and International Standard Organization (ISO), ISO 19136:2007. Geographic Information -Geography Markup Language. ISO, 2007.

13. Open Geospatial Consortium and International Standard Organization (ISO), ISO 19136-2:2015. Geography Markup Language (GML) --Part 2: Extended schemas and encoding rules. ISO, 2015.

14. Open Geospatial Consortium and International Standard Organization (ISO), ISO 19156:2011. Geographic Information -Observations and Measurements. ISO, 2013.

15. International Standard Organization (ISO), ISO 639-2:1998. Codes for the representation of names of languages --Part 2: Alpha-3 code. ISO, 1998.

16. L. Olsina and M. Martín, Ontology for Software Metrics and Indicators. Journal of Web Engineering (JWE), vol. 3, nº 4, pp. 262-281, 2004.

17. L. Olsina, et. al., “How to Measure and Evaluate Web Applications in a Consistent Way”, Chapter 13 in Web Engineering, pp. 385–420, Edited by G. Rossi, O. Pastor, Daniel Schwabe & L. Olsina. Springer, London, England, 2008.

18. J Samosir, et.al., “An evaluation of data stream processing systems for data driven applications,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 80, pp. 439-449, June 2016.

19. P. Szeredi, et.al. “The Semantic Web explained: the technology and mathematics behind Web 3.0,” Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, 2014.

20. IJECE ISSN: 2088-8708, Towards a Consistent Measurement Stream Processing from Heterogeneous Data Sources (Mario Diván) 3175.

Similar Articles

11-20 of 99
Author Info
Submit Paper