Optimized IPv6 Addressing Scheme for Node Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks
Downloads
Keywords
Article Usage Chart
Abstract
Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) have become integral to modern monitoring, industrial automation, and Internet of Things (IoT) applications due to their ability to provide real-time, distributed sensing across diverse environments. However, conventional IPv6-based addressing schemes for WSNs often face challenges related to scalability, energy efficiency, and routing optimization, particularly in large-scale or mobile networks. This research proposes an optimized IPv6 addressing scheme that integrates hierarchical and location-based encoding to enhance node localization, routing efficiency, and energy utilization in WSNs. The proposed framework embeds cluster identifiers and geographic coordinates within the IPv6 address structure, enabling routers to make routing decisions based on topological and spatial information, thereby reducing address resolution time, broadcast overhead, and overall network energy consumption. A hybrid localization approach combining range-based and range-free techniques is employed to balance accuracy and computational complexity. Simulation and analytical results demonstrate that the proposed addressing scheme reduces average path lengths by 18%, address resolution latency by up to 35%, and energy consumption per transmission by 15–20% when compared to conventional IPv6 and 6LoWPAN implementations (Ghassan & Mohammad, 2019; O’Daniel et al., 2018). Furthermore, the scheme maintains robust performance under large-scale deployments exceeding 1,000 nodes and dynamically changing network topologies. The framework also adheres to IETF IPv6 special-use addressing guidelines, ensuring compatibility with existing standards (Blanchet, 2008; Shelby et al., 2013). Critical analysis reveals trade-offs related to initial computational overhead during address generation and minor communication overhead for dynamic updates, which are outweighed by improvements in routing efficiency and network longevity. The findings provide significant implications for industrial IoT networks, smart grid systems, and other mission-critical WSN applications where timely data delivery and energy optimization are paramount. This study contributes a comprehensive, scalable, and standards-compliant IPv6 addressing strategy, providing a foundation for future research on dynamic, large-scale, and heterogeneous WSN deployments, and opening avenues for integrating enhanced security mechanisms and IoT protocol interoperability.Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) have become integral to modern monitoring, industrial automation, and Internet of Things (IoT) applications due to their ability to provide real-time, distributed sensing across diverse environments. However, conventional IPv6-based addressing
schemes for WSNs often face challenges related to scalability, energy efficiency, and routing optimization, particularly in large-scale or mobile networks. This research proposes an optimized IPv6 addressing scheme that integrates hierarchical and location-based encoding to enhance node localization, routing efficiency, and energy utilization in WSNs. The proposed framework embeds cluster identifiers and geographic coordinates within the IPv6 address structure, enabling routers to make routing decisions based on topological and spatial information, thereby reducing address resolution time, broadcast overhead, and overall network energy consumption. A hybrid localization approach combining range-based and range-free techniques is employed to balance accuracy and computational complexity. Simulation and analytical results demonstrate that the proposed addressing scheme reduces average path lengths by 18%, address resolution latency by up to 35%, and energy consumption per transmission by 15–20% when compared to conventional IPv6 and 6LoWPAN implementations (Ghassan & Mohammad, 2019; O’Daniel et al., 2018). Furthermore, the scheme maintains robust performance under large-scale deployments exceeding 1,000 nodes and dynamically changing network topologies. The framework also adheres to IETF IPv6 special-use addressing guidelines, ensuring compatibility with existing standards (Blanchet, 2008; Shelby et al., 2013). Critical analysis reveals trade-offs related to initial computational overhead during address generation and minor communication overhead for dynamic updates, which are outweighed by improvements in routing efficiency and network longevity. The findings provide significant implications for industrial IoT networks, smart grid systems, and other mission-critical WSN applications where timely data delivery and energy optimization are paramount. This study contributes a comprehensive, scalable, and standards-compliant IPv6 addressing strategy, providing a foundation for future research on dynamic, large-scale, and heterogeneous WSN deployments, and opening avenues for integrating enhanced security mechanisms and IoT protocol interoperability.
Downloads
References
1. Alhasanat, A., et al., "Data collection algorithm for wireless sensor networks using collaborative mobile elements," International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), vol. 9(3), pp. 2131-2140, 2019.
2. Blanchet, M., "Special-Use IPv6 Addresses," RFC 5156, 2008.
3. Chehri, A., Jeon, G., Choi, B., "Link-quality measurement and reporting in wireless sensor networks," Sensors, vol. 13, pp. 3066–3076, 2013.
4. Cheng, C.-Y., Chuang, C.-C., Chang, R.-I., "Three-dimensional location-based IPv6 addressing for wireless sensor networks in smart grid," 2012 IEEE 26th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA), IEEE, pp. 824–831, 2012.
5. Cotton, M., Vegoda, L., Bonica, R., Haberman, B., "Special-purpose IP address registries," IETF, pp. 1721–2070, Apr. 2013.
6. Devasena, C. L., "IPv6 Low Power Wireless Personal Area Network (6LoWPAN) for Networking Internet of Things (IoT)–Analyzing its Suitability for IoT," Indian Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 9(30), 2016.
7. Ding, R., Du, H., "Location-based IP addressing in IP-enable wireless sensor networks," in 2011 International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems Engineering (CASE), IEEE, pp. 1–4, 2011.
8. Ghassan, S., Mohammad, A., "Efficient energy, cost reduction, and QoS based routing protocol for wireless sensor networks," International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), vol. 9(1), pp. 496-504, 2019.
9. Gopinath, R. S., et al., "A gateway solution for IPv6 wireless sensor networks," in International Conference on Ultra Modern Telecommunications & Workshops, 2009. ICUMT’09. IEEE, pp. 1–6, 2009.
10. Ishaq, I., et al., "IETF standardization in the field of the internet of things (IoT): a survey," J. Sens. Actuator Networks, vol. 2, pp. 235–287, 2013.
11. Ismail, N. H. A., et al., "A study on protocol stack in 6LoWPAN model," Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, Little Lion Scientific Islamabad Pakistan, vol. 41(2), pp. 220–229, 2012.
12. Kujur, R. R., Dwivedi, A. K., "Exploration of Existing Frameworks for Connecting Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) with Current Internet," International Journal of Computer Applications, Foundation of Computer Science, vol. 86(4), 2014.
13. Kushalnagar, N., et al., "IPv6 over low-power wireless personal area networks (6LoWPANs): overview, assumptions, problem statement, and goals," RFC 4919 (Informational), Internet Engineering Task Force, 2007.
14. Li, X., et al., "LaConf: A Localized Address Autoconfiguration Scheme for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks," Tsinghua Science & Technology, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pp. 529–538, 2011.
15. Maheshwari, H. K., "Optimizing range aware localization in wireless sensor networks (WSNs)," PhD thesis, University of Leeds, 2011.
16. Ma, L., et al., "IP communication optimization for 6LoWPAN-Based Wireless Sensor Networks," Sensors & Transducers, IFSA Publishing, SL2014, vol. 174(7), pp. 81, 2014.
17. Montenegro, G., et al., "Transmission of IPv6 packets over IEEE 802.15.4 networks," 2007.
18. O’Daniel, T., Hussein, M. N., Abdulla, R., "Localization using GPS Coordinates in IPv6 Addresses of Wireless Sensor Network Nodes," Indian J. Sci. Technol., vol. 9, 2016.
19. O’Daniel, T., Hussein, M. N., Abdulla, R., "Location Determination Using Tesselated Addresses in IPv6 Wireless Sensor Networks," Adv. Sci. Lett., vol. 24, pp. 1723–1726, 2018.
20. Olsson, J., "6LoWPAN demystified," Texas Instruments, pp. 13, 2014.
21. Shahra, E. Q., Sheltami, T. R., Shakshuki, E. M., "A comparative study of range-free and range-based localization protocols for wireless sensor network: Using cooja simulator," International Journal of Distributed Systems and Technologies (IJDST), IGI Global, vol. 8(1), pp. 1–16, 2017.
22. Shelby, Z., et al., "RFC 6775: Neighbor discovery optimization for IPv6 over low-power wireless personal area networks (6LoWPANs)," The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), pp. 28, 2013.
23. Tyagi, M. P., Jain, M. S., "Comparative Study of Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Network," International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, Citeseer, vol. 2(9), 2012.
24. Xu, Y., et al., "Connect Internet with sensors by 6LoWPAN," Journal of Networks, vol. 8(7), pp. 1480–1487, 2013.