Research Article Peer Reviewed Open Access DOI Supported
Articles

Markov Chain–Based Reliability Modeling and Block Diagram Framework for Performance Evaluation of Electrical Power Generation Systems Under Uncertainty

2025-10-29 Vol. 12 No. 5 (2025): Volume 12 Issue 5
Downloads

Keywords

Markov Chain modeling Reliability Block Diagram Power system reliability Stochastic modeling
Article Usage Statistics
Live Metrics
Abstract Views
250
File Views
87
PDF
0
HTML
0
Other
87
Total
337

Article Usage Chart

Abstract
250
File Views
87
PDF
0
HTML
0
Other
87
Total
337

Abstract

The increasing complexity of modern electrical power generation systems, driven by renewable integration, deregulation, and distributed energy resources, has intensified the need for robust reliability evaluation frameworks capable of capturing stochastic behavior under uncertainty. This study proposes a Markov Chain–based reliability modeling approach integrated with a Reliability Block Diagram (RBD) framework for comprehensive performance assessment of electrical power generation systems. The proposed methodology combines probabilistic state-transition modeling with structural system decomposition to evaluate system-level reliability indices such as availability, failure probability, and expected energy not supplied.
Traditional deterministic reliability approaches are insufficient for systems characterized by renewable intermittency, component aging, and dynamic load variability. Therefore, stochastic modeling techniques such as Markov processes provide a mathematically rigorous mechanism to represent state transitions between operational, degraded, and failed conditions. Additionally, RBD structures enhance interpretability by mapping system configurations into series-parallel reliability relationships. The integration of these two methods enables multi-level reliability assessment from component to system scale.
The study builds upon established reliability frameworks in power systems and hybrid energy networks, particularly highlighting recent advancements in probabilistic evaluation and microgrid reliability modeling (Adefarati and Bansal, 2019). The proposed framework is applicable to both centralized and distributed generation systems, including renewable-integrated grids and hybrid storage-supported configurations. Comparative analysis with classical approaches demonstrates improved accuracy in failure prediction and system resilience estimation.
Overall, the research contributes a unified analytical framework that enhances decision-making in power system planning, operation, and resilience optimization under uncertainty.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. A. Abdulkarim, N. Faruk, A. O. Oloyede, and O. Abiodun, “Reliability study of stand-alone hybrid renewable energy microgrids,” Iranian journal of science and technology, transactions of electrical engineering, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 411-425, 2019.

2. T. Adefarati and R. C. Bansal, “Reliability, economic and environmental analysis of a microgrid system in the presence of renewable energy resources,” Applied Energy, vol. 236, pp. 1089-1114, 2019.

3. A. M. Ranjbar, A. Jafari, and M. F.-Firuzabad, “Reliability evaluation of deregulated electric power systems for planning applications,” reliability engineering & system safety, vol. 93, no. 10, pp. 1473-1484, 2008.

4. A. Bourezg and H. Meglouli, “Reliability assessment of power distribution systems using disjoint path-set algorithm,” Journal of industrial engineering international, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 45-57, Mar. 2015.

5. M. M. Othman, M. A. N. M. Jamaluddin, F. Fauzi, and I. Musirin, “Improved reliability assessment of backup battery storage integrated with power supply system in a building,” International Journal of Power Electronics and drive system (IJPEDS), vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1538-1546, 2019.

6. V. S. K. Babu, Madhusudan, and V. Ganesh, “Probabilistic performance index base contingency screening for composite power system reliability evaluation,” International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 2661-2670, 2018.

7. R. A. Bakkiyara and N. Kumarappan, “Particle swarm optimization based optimal reliability design of composite electric power system using non-sequential Monte Carlo sampling and generalized regression neural network,” International conference on swarm, evolutionary, and memetic computing SEMCCO 2013, Springer, Cham, vol. 8297, 2013, pp. 580-589.

8. R. Billintonzand R. N. Allan, “Reliability of electric power systems: an overview,” in: pham h. (Eds) handbook of reliability engineering, springer, London, 2003, pp. 511-528.

9. R. Billinton and R. N. Allan, “Reliability assessment of large electric power systems,” Springer, 2012.

10. B. Boussahoua and A. Elmaouhab, "Reliability Analysis of Electrical Power System Using Graph Theory and Reliability Block Diagram," 2019 Algerian Large Electrical Network Conference (CAGRE), Algiers, Algeria, 2019, pp. 1-6.

11. A. Ehsani, A. M. Ranjbar, A. Jafari, and M. F.-Firuzabad, “Reliability evaluation of deregulated electric power systems for planning applications,” reliability engineering & system safety, vol. 93, no. 10, pp. 1473-1484, 2008.

12. M. Ghiasi, N. Ghadimi, and E. Ahmadinia, “An analytical methodology for reliability assessment and failure analysis in distributed power system,” SN Applied Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, Jan. 2019.

13. K. Kunaifi and A. Reinders, “Perceived and reported reliability of the electricity supply at three urban locations in Indonesia,” Energies, MDPI, vol. 11, no. 1, 2018, Art. no. 140.

14. H. Kim and C. Singh, “Composite power system reliability modeling and evaluation considering aging components,” 2009 International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering - ELECO 2009, Bursa, Turkey, 2009, pp. I-14-I-18.

15. A. Jaber, A. Z. Ahmad, and N. A. Shalash, “Multi-agent approach to reliability assessment of power system generation using fuzzy logic,” International journal of simulation-systems, science & technology, vol. 17, no. 26, pp. 18.1-18.9, October 2016.

16. C. J. Crabtree, C. Dao, F. Dinmohamadi, D. Flynn, A. Thompson, and B. Kazemtabrizi, “Reliability and economic evaluation of high voltage direct current interconnectors for large-scale renewable energy integration and transmission,” 15th IET international conference on AC and DC power transmission (ACDC 2019), Coventry, UK, vol. 10, no. 6, 2019, pp. 1-7.

17. E. H. Joseph, K. H. LaCommare, H. C. Caswell, and D. Till, “Distribution system versus bulk power system: identifying the source of electric service interruptions in the US,” IET generation, transmission & distribution, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 717-723, Feb. 2019.

18. S. S. Raghuwanshi and R. Arya, “Reliability evaluation of stand-alone hybrid photovoltaic energy system for rural healthcare centre,” Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, vol. 37, 2020, Art. no. 100624.

19. C. Ordoudis, P. Pierre, M. Gonzalez, J. Miguel, and Z. Marco, “An updated version of the ieee 24-bus system for electricity market and power system operation studies,” Technical university of Denmark, 2016.

20. Y. Liu and C. Singh, “Reliability Evaluation of Composite Power Systems Using Markov Cut-Set Method,” in IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 777-785, May 2010.

21. N. Faruk, A. O. Oloyede, O. Abiodun, A. Abdulkarim, and A. Z. Ahmad, “Reliability evaluation in electrical power systems: the Weibull-Markov stochastic model,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 911-915, May-Jun. 2000.

22. G. Muñoz-Delgado, J. Contreras and J. M. Arroyo, “Reliability Assessment for Distribution Optimization Models: A Non-Simulation-Based Linear Programming Approach,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 3048-3059, Jul. 2018.

23. S. S. Sarma, V. Madhusudhan, and V. Ganesh, “Reliability worth assessment of active distribution system considering protective devices and multiple distributed generation units,” International Journal of Applied Power Engineering (IJAPE), vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 111-119, 2018.

24. N. A. Shalash, A. Z. Ahmad, and A. Jaber, “Multi-agent approach to reliability assessment of power system generation using fuzzy logic,” International journal of simulation-systems, science & technology, vol. 17, no. 26, pp. 18.1-18.9, October 2016.

25. M. Čepin, “Assessment of power system reliability methods and applications,” Springer Science and Business Media, Jul. 2011.

26. T. T. Pham, T.-Chi Kuo, and D. M. Bui, “Reliability evaluation of an aggregate battery energy storage system in microgrids under dynamic operation,” International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 118, 2020, Art. no. 105786.

27. M. H. J. Bollen and M. E. Schmieg, “Reliability assessment in electrical power systems: the Weibull-Markov stochastic model,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 911-915, May-Jun. 2000.

28. Y. Ren et al., “A reliability evaluation method for radial multi-microgrid systems considering distribution network transmission capacity,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 139, 2020, Art. no. 106145.

29. IEEE Reliability Test System, in IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. PAS-98, no. 6, pp. 2047-2054, Nov. 1979.

30. J. F. L. van Casteren, M. H. J. Bollen and M. E. Schmieg, “Reliability assessment in electrical power systems: the Weibull-Markov stochastic model,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 911-915, May-Jun. 2000.

Similar Articles

11-20 of 141
Author Info
Submit Paper