Research Article Peer Reviewed Open Access DOI Supported
Articles

Analysis of Surface Coating and Multi-Particle Contamination on Electrical Breakdown Characteristics in Gas-Insulated Bus Ducts

2015-03-13 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2015): Volume 02 Issue 01
Downloads

Keywords

Gas-insulated bus ducts electrical breakdown surface coating multi-particle contamination
Article Usage Statistics
Live Metrics
Abstract Views
174
File Views
89
PDF
0
HTML
0
Other
89
Total
263

Article Usage Chart

Abstract
174
File Views
89
PDF
0
HTML
0
Other
89
Total
263

Abstract

Electrical breakdown in gas-insulated bus ducts (GIBDs) remains a critical reliability challenge in high-voltage power systems, directly impacting operational safety, system stability, and equipment longevity. The present study investigates the combined influence of surface coatings on earthed enclosures and the presence of multi-particle contamination on the dielectric performance of GIBDs. Surface coatings, particularly those employing functionally graded materials (FGMs), modify the local electric field distribution by providing a dielectric buffer that mitigates peak field intensities near spacer surfaces and electrode interfaces. Conversely, contaminating particles, both metallic and dielectric, introduce localized field enhancements, creating critical points for partial discharge initiation and accelerating the onset of electrical breakdown.
To quantify these effects, a finite element method (FEM)-based computational framework was developed, capable of simulating quasi-static electric fields in complex geometries, incorporating variable coating thicknesses, dielectric properties, and particle distributions. The simulation methodology, aligned with the principles outlined by Meeker (2006), enables high-resolution analysis of field distortions induced by multiple contaminating particles interacting with coated surfaces. Various scenarios were evaluated, including differing particle concentrations, spatial arrangements, and coating configurations, to systematically examine their impact on peak electric field magnitudes and breakdown voltage thresholds.
Results indicate that while dielectric coatings effectively reduce peak electric fields by up to 25% in certain configurations, the presence of multiple contaminating particles can significantly offset this mitigation, especially in clustered particle arrangements. Predicted breakdown voltages show that coatings improve voltage withstand in moderately contaminated systems but cannot fully compensate for high particle densities. These findings underscore the necessity of a combined approach, integrating coating optimization with rigorous contamination control, to maximize insulation reliability in GIBDs.
The study contributes a detailed analytical framework for assessing breakdown risks, providing critical insights for design engineers and researchers focused on high-voltage insulation systems. By integrating theoretical electrostatic principles, FEM-based numerical simulations, and validated literature data, the research offers a predictive tool for evaluating the synergistic effects of coatings and contamination. Limitations of the study, including quasi-static assumptions, particle characterization constraints, and the exclusion of transient or thermal effects, are discussed, and directions for future work are proposed, emphasizing the potential for multiphysics simulations and experimental validation.
This comprehensive analysis enhances the understanding of breakdown mechanisms in gas-insulated systems, facilitates informed design of dielectric coatings, and provides  
practical guidance for mitigating the risks associated with multi-particle contamination, thereby advancing the reliability and safety of high-voltage power infrastructure. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. M.A. Abd Allah, Sayed A. Ward, Amr A. Youssef, “Effect of Functionally Graded Material of Disc Spacer with Presence of Multi-Contaminating Particles on Electric Field inside Gas Insulated Bus Duct”, International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), Vol. 3, No. 6, pp.831-848, 2013.

2. Sayed A. Ward, M. A. Abd Allah, Amr A. Youssef, “Multi-Particle Initiated Breakdown of Gas Mixtures inside Compressed Gas Devices”, Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena (CEIDP) Conference, IEEE, pp. 353-356, 2012.

3. S. Berger, “Onset of breakdown voltage reduction by electrode surface roughness in air and SF6”, IEEE Trans. on PAS, Vol. PAS-95, No. 4, pp. 1073-1079, 1976.

4. Jawad Faiz, M Ojaghi, “'Instructive Review of Computation of Electric Fields using Different Numerical Techniques,” International Journal of Engineering. 2002; 18(3): 344-356.

5. T.W. Dakin, G. Luxa, G. Oppermann, J. Vigreux, G. Wind, H. Winkeln-Kemper, "Breakdown of gases in uniform fields, Paschen curves for nitrogen, air and sulphur-hexaflouride", Electra. CIGRE Paper, No.32, pp. 64-70, 1974.

6. Rauno Gordon, Tuukka Arola, Katrina Wendel, Outi Ryynanen and Jari Hyttinen, “Accuracy of numerical methods by calculating static and quasistatic electric fields,” Proc. Estonian Acad. Sci. Eng. 2006; 12: 262-283.

7. E Kuffel, WS Zaengl and J Kuffel. “High Voltage Engineering Fundamentals,” Second edition, Butterworth-Heinemann Linacre House, Jordan Hill, Oxford OX2 8DP, 225 Wildwood Avenue, Woburn, MA01801-2041. 2000: 246-254.

8. K.B. Madhu Sahu and J. Amarnath, “Movement of metallic particle contamination in a gas insulated busduct under dielectric coated enclosure with electromagnetic field effect”, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 3, No. 7, pp. 764-769, July 2010.

9. N. H. Malik, A. H. Qureshi, “A review of electrical breakdown in mixtures of SF6 and other gases”, IEEE Transaction on Electrical Insulation, Vol. EI-14, No. 1, pp. 1-13, 1979.

10. N. H. Malik and A. H. Qureshi, “Breakdown mechanisms in sulphur-hexafluoride”, IEEE Trans. on Elect. Insul., Vol. EI-12, No. 3, pp. 135-145, 1978.

11. A Rein, “Breakdown mechanisms and breakdown criteria in gases: Measurement of discharge parameters. A literature survey”, Bioctra, No. 32, pp. 43-60, 1974.

12. David Meeker, “Finite Element Method Magnetics, Version 4.2, User’s Manual,” September 2006.

Similar Articles

11-20 of 88
Author Info
Submit Paper