Research Article Peer Reviewed Open Access DOI Supported
Articles

Adaptive Neural Observer Framework for Discrete-Time Non-Affine Nonlinear Systems with Uncertainty

2015-01-05 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2015): Volume 02 Issue 01
Downloads

Keywords

Adaptive Neural Observer Discrete-Time Nonlinear Systems Non-Affine Systems
Article Usage Statistics
Live Metrics
Abstract Views
212
File Views
88
PDF
0
HTML
0
Other
88
Total
300

Article Usage Chart

Abstract
212
File Views
88
PDF
0
HTML
0
Other
88
Total
300

Abstract

In modern control engineering, precise state estimation of nonlinear systems under uncertainty remains a significant challenge, particularly for discrete-time non-affine dynamics. This paper introduces an Adaptive Neural Observer Framework designed to address the limitations of classical observers when dealing with parametric uncertainties, unmodeled dynamics, and external disturbances. The proposed framework integrates recurrent neural networks (RNNs) with a sliding-mode observer architecture, providing robust state estimation while maintaining real-time adaptability. By employing Lyapunov-based stability analysis, the observer guarantees convergence of the estimation error, ensuring that the system’s states can be accurately tracked despite nonlinearities and uncertainties. Simulation studies are conducted on discrete-time models of induction motors and other representative nonlinear systems, comparing the proposed framework with classical Luenberger-like observers and baseline neural observers. Results demonstrate that the proposed approach significantly improves convergence speed, estimation accuracy, and disturbance rejection, achieving near-zero steady-state errors within a shorter time horizon. Furthermore, the adaptive mechanism allows the observer to compensate for parameter variations and unmodeled nonlinearities, offering superior performance in scenarios where traditional methods fail. The study also explores the theoretical underpinnings of neural observer design, including stability guarantees, convergence properties, and robustness considerations, while providing critical analysis of trade-offs such as computational complexity and real-time implementation constraints. This work not only extends the theoretical foundations of nonlinear observer design but also offers practical insights for applications in high-performance motor drives, robotics, and energy systems where precise state knowledge is essential. The findings suggest that the proposed adaptive neural observer framework is a robust, scalable, and practically implementable solution for discrete-time non-affine nonlinear systems, bridging the gap between classical control theory and modern machine learning-based estimation techniques. These contributions provide a significant step forward in advancing reliable, adaptive, and efficient state estimation methods for complex engineering systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. AY Alanis, EN Sanchez, AG Loukianov, and MA Perez-Cisneros. Real-time discrete neural block control using sliding modes for electric induction motors. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. Jan 2010; 18(1)11–21.

2. G Besançon. Nonlinear Observers and Applications (Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences). Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag. 2007; 363.

3. K K Busawon, M Saif. A state observer for nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1999.

4. F Chen, M W Dunnigan. Comparative study of a sliding-mode observer and Kalman filters for full state estimation in an induction machine. IEE Proc. Electric Power Appl. Jan 2002; 149 (1): 53–64.

5. DF Coutinho, L.P.F.A. Pereira. A robust Luenberger-like observer for induction machines. in Proc. 31st Annu. Conf. IEEE Ind. Electron. Soc. 2005: 1–5.

6. M Elbuluk, T Liu, and I Husain. Neural network-based model reference adaptive systems for high performance motor drives and motion controls. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. May–Jun. 2002; 38(3): 879–886.

7. R Ghasemi. Designing Observer Based Variable Structure Controller for Large Scale Nonlinear Systems. IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI). 2013; 2 (3): 125-135.

8. SS Ge, J Zhang, and TH Lee. Adaptive neural network control for a class of MIMO nonlinear systems with disturbances in discrete-time. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man Cybern, and Part B: Cybern. Aug. 2004; 34(4): 1630–1645.

9. A Germani, C Manes, and P Pepe. A new approach to state observation of nonlinear systems with delayed output. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 2002; 47.

10. R Grover, and PYC Hwang. Introduction to Random Signals and Applied Kalman Filtering. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1992.

11. H Huang, G Feng, and J Cao. Robust state estimation for uncertain neural networks with time-varying delay. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Aug. 2008; 19(8): 1329–1339.

12. Haykin S, Puskorius, GV, Feldkamp. Kalman Filtering and Neural Networks. John Wiley & Sons, NY, 2002.

13. S Haykin. Kalman Filtering and Neural Networks. New York: Wiley, 2001.

14. H K Khalil, Nonlinear Systems. 2nd ed, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1996.

15. YH Kim and FL Lewis. High-Level Feedback Control with Neural Networks. Singapore: World Scientific, 1998.

16. DG Luenberger. Observing the state of a linear system. IEEE Transactions Military Electronics. 1964; 8(2): 74–80.

17. AU Levin, KS Narendra. Control of nonlinear dynamical systems using neural networks. II. Observability, identification, and control. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Jan. 1996: 7(1): 30–42.

18. RJ Marino. Adaptive observers for single output nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. Sep. 1990; 35(9): 1054–1058.

19. EN Sanchez, LJ Ricalde. Trajectory tracking via adaptive recurrent control with input saturation. in Proc. Int. Joint Conf. Neural Netw. Jul. 2003; 1: 359–364.

20. AS Poznyak, EN Sanchez, and W Yu. Differential Neural Networks for Robust Nonlinear Control. Singapore: World Scientific. 2001.

21. AS Tlili, N Benhadj Braiek. State observation of nonlinear and uncertain system: Application to induction motor. International Journal of Power and Energy Systems. 2008; 28: 252-262.

22. S Singhal, L Wu. Training multilayer perceptrons with the extended Kalman algorithm. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 1989; 1: 133–140.

23. S Singhal, L Wu. Training multilayer perceptrons with the extended Kalman algorithm. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 1989; 1: 133–140.

24. W Bing. Perception Neural Networks for Active Noise Control Systems. TELKOMNIKA Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering. 2012; 10(7): 1815-1822.

25. GC Verghese, and R Sanders. Observers for flux estimation in induction machines. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. 1988; 35(1): 85 – 94.

26. B Walcott and S Zak. State observation of nonlinear uncertain dynamical systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. Feb. 1987; 32(2): 166–170.

27. RJ Williams, D Zipser. A learning algorithm for continually running fully recurrent neural networks. Neural Comput. 1989; 1(2): 270–280.

28. J Theocharis, V Petridis. Neural network observer for induction motor control. IEEE Control Systems, 1994.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 141
Author Info
Submit Paper